Press Release
“Despite a new Court of Appeal the judicial backlog is not being reduced,” Mattie McGrath
31-08-2017
Independent
TD Mattie McGrath has called on the Minister for Justice, Charlie
Flanagan, to address ongoing concerns around the inability of the Court
of Appeal to address its persistently high backlog of civil and criminal
cases. Deputy McGrath was speaking after an analysis of the Court
Service’s Annual Report for 2016 by Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer in Law
at Maynooth University Department of Law, found that without
significant reform the Court of Appeal will be incapable of reducing its
judicial backlog:
“This
analysis by Seth Barrett Tillman is a forensic deconstruction of the
spin that is being pedalled regarding the impact the ‘new’ Court of
Appeal is allegedly having on addressing the current backlog of cases.
At
the time the idea of the new Court was being sold to the Irish people,
it was touted as a kind of panacea for the massive delays that were
afflicting our judicial system.
Some
of us tried to highlight the fact that all this would do, in the
absence of more fundamental reform, was to create the illusion of
progress.
That position has now been vindicated.
Seth
Barrett Tillman has shown that in the course of the Court of Appeal’s
second complete calendar year, with millions spent, the number of
pending cases started at 1,814, and by the end of the year the number of
pending cases increased to 1,821. In other words, there was no net
reduction in the number of cases in the backlog.
In point of fact he has also highlighted that there was a 19% decrease in the number of cases disposed of between 2015 and 2016.
All of these issues raise profound challenges for the operation of this Court and public value for money.
They
must be addressed and scrutinised without the kind of delays that may
arising from an undue sense of deference toward judges.
If
they are not getting through the backlog then questions need to be
asked about why that is happening year after year even with additional
Court facilities at their disposal.
The
reasonable conclusion is that more fundamental reform is needed instead
of creating another Court with the exact same procedural blocks as has
happened in this case,” concluded Deputy McGrath.
END
Notes for Editors:
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘The Court of Appeal Backlog’ (2017) 35(15) Irish Law Times 206–08 (2017) <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2996405>.
This 2017 article continues and extends the arguments which I developed
in my prior publications: see, e.g., Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘Has the
Irish Court of Appeal Solved the Judicial Backlog? Can it?’ (2016)
34(14) Irish Law Times 210–12 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2816458>;
see also, e.g., Seth Barrett Tillman, Opinion Editorial, ‘Court of
Appeal just a new version of Supreme Court—only more costly’ The Irish Times (July 28, 2014, 1:30 AM), at 7 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2465554>; Seth Barrett Tillman, Opinion Editorial, ‘Time to Open Courts and Let Justice Be Seen’ The Irish Independent, August 22, 2012, 17:00 pm, at A14 <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2129771>.
Le gach dea ghuí,
Le gach dea ghuí,
Mattie
Mattie McGrath TD
Tipperary Constituency
------------------------------------------------
Seth Barrett Tillman adding: The language in bold is from the TD, and it was not in my Irish Law Times article. That said, I entirely agree with his sentiment.
Seth Barrett Tillman, Press Release from a Member of the Irish National Legislature, New Reform Club (Sept. 1, 2017, 4:23 AM), http://tinyurl.com/ycfapaof
McGrath's website: http://mattiemcgrath.ie/despite-a-new-court-of-appeal-the-judicial-backlog-is-not-being-reduced-mattie-mcgrath/.
McGrath's website: http://mattiemcgrath.ie/despite-a-new-court-of-appeal-the-judicial-backlog-is-not-being-reduced-mattie-mcgrath/.
No comments:
Post a Comment