Pascal says that God “instituted prayer in order to allow His creatures the dignity of causality”. There are some things that are within our direct power to do: we wash our hands, and (save for Lady Macbeth) our hands become clean. Most of the events that go on in the universe are, of course, out of our hands. But that is not to say they are out of our control, for we may still pray for them.
Thursday, November 24, 2022
Sunday, November 13, 2022
Hodges arrest video is making rounds on the internet, along with commentary. It
strikes me that the commentary is not focused on the most central fact of the
focus of most of the commentary is on the Terry stop (Terry v. Ohio,
391 U.S. 1 (1968) (Warren, C.J.)) and the lawfulness of the original detention. That detention was
(it appears to me) illegal. Thus, it is no surprise (as has been reported) that
the state’s attorney has declined to prosecute Hodges. Likewise, it is no
surprise (as has been reported) that one or both of the police officers have
is not being discussed sufficiently (if at all) is the last 10 to 15 seconds of
the video. In that segment, Hodges asks the arresting officers for their names and identification numbers, and he indicates that he will seek some sanction
against them for their wrongfully detaining him. Hodges appears to be “threatening” to sue
them. But such a “threat” is not illegal; rather, it is lawful First-Amendment-protected speech. It is only at that juncture that the
more senior police officer tells his junior to arrest Hodges for “resisting”
arrest. It seems to me that any such arrest is fairly characterized as retaliation
for Hodges’ exercising free speech. Any such retaliation is a consequential constitutional
violation quite apart from the initial wrongful detention.
When one adds, that Hodges is (apparently) legally blind, and a veteran (as has been reported), and was on the street in the early morning specifically because he was returning home from a mandatory jury duty summons (or, so he claims), he will make a most sympathetic civil rights (42 U.S.C. § 1983) plaintiff before any jury.
Finally, it is all captured on video. So the facts will not be much in dispute. Lawyers should be lining up around the block to take this case. It might be worth a big pay day—whether it goes to trial or settles. And even if the defendants (i.e., the municipality and the individual officers) are only compelled to make a payment at the smaller end of the spectrum, Hodges’ case should be a very easy win, and it should be a win taking little time. Any trial court victory will place the lawyer in the news. It is free favorable advertising for his or her practice and/or for a future run for political office.
UPDATE: The Arrest of James Hodges: An Update, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-QDMUdGfEw>;
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘The Arrest of James Hodges,’ New Reform Club (Nov. 13, 2022, 5:07 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/11/the-arrest-of-james-hodges.html>;
Friday, November 11, 2022
And I live in a welfare state that has more tax revenues than it can possibly find ways to squander. We live on a hill and I have a shotgun and you only see this
when you get off the freeway. Every freeway, but hey, you're on your way to somewhere else. Vanishes from your rear-view mirror before you even look back.
The Red Tsunami didn't happen because this is the New Normal: Biden bad; Orange Man worse. Life goes on.
Saturday, November 05, 2022
November 5, 2022, I was awarded the 2021 North Carolina Society of Historians’ Award
of Excellence for Outstanding Contribution to the Preservation and Perpetuation
of North Carolina History and Heritage. What follows is my awards dinner speech,
parts of which were read in absentia.
First, I would like to
thank the North Carolina Society of Historians, its members, officers, and,
especially its judges for choosing my two Jacob Henry-related papers for the society’s Award of
Excellence for a significant contribution to the preservation and perpetuation
of the history and heritage of North Carolina. In an earlier, simpler time, we
would not have to reflect on the need for such organizations. But now is not
such a time—ours is a time when older certainties are not merely forgotten or questioned,
but vilified. So the central task of a historical society, as with sister
cultural institutions, is a critically important one: it is to remember and to
preserve what can be preserved for a better future which all hope will emerge—even
if we cannot clearly see it today.
Second, I should especially like to thank my home institution, Maynooth University, and my current head of department, Professor Michael Doherty, for providing me with the opportunity to take a sabbatical, which made writing these articles possible. Also, there were any number of archivists and librarians, anonymous reviewers, editors, and others who I owe thanks—especially Professor Sandeep Gopalan, my former head of department, and now Vice-Chancellor of Carolina University, Annie Miller, at the North Carolina Historical Review, and Professor Yvonne Pitts, Purdue University, at the American Journal of Legal History. As usual, my wife, Nora, reviewed any number of drafts—of both articles.
Third, I would like to
express my apologies for being unable to attend your awards ceremony. My living
across the Atlantic and your dinner’s timing preclude my attending and
Fourth, I left the
United States some eleven years ago and moved abroad, to Ireland, to find work—I
teach in an Irish university. Still, one misses home. And also one’s
publications, which focus on a foreign country—that is the United States, are
of less interest to the Irish than they would be to other Americans. In such circumstances,
one can only wonder if one’s research and writing is being well received. Although
winning such an award is gratifying to any recipient, I think I can fairly
state it means a bit more to an expatriate—such as myself—to know that one’s
publications are appreciated in the home country. For that, I thank you.
finally, in my papers on Jacob Henry, I attempted to peel back a veneer
of historical silence. A few have privately noted to me that in doing so, I
undid (in a small way) what Henry and his contemporaries accomplished: elevating
Henry to the status of folk hero in the hope of crafting a culture of American
religious tolerance. That may be so. But the other view, is that in reducing Henry’s
heroic status, I have elevated the accomplishment of all those other unknown
North Carolinians who, in 1809, crafted our society’s culture of religious tolerance.
And perhaps, it is those unknowns who are the heroes our society most needs
Is mise le meas,
Seth Barrett Tillman
 Seth Barrett Tillman, What Oath (if any) did Jacob Henry take in 1809?: Deconstructing the Historical Myths, 61 American Journal of Legal History 349 (Dec. 2021) (peer review), <https://tinyurl.com/3etu53m3>, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3790115>; Seth Barrett Tillman, A Religious Test in America?: The 1809 Motion to Vacate Jacob Henry’s North Carolina State Legislative Seat—A Re-Evaluation of the Primary Sources, 98 North Carolina Historical Review 1 (Jan. 2021) (peer review), <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3498217>.
 Pronounced: Ish mish-a leh may-os. It is an Irish phrase meaning “It is I, with respect.”