At 18 weeks, you may call this what you want. But it is manifestly more than a "clump of cells" and 2/3 of Americans consistently agree that there is no "right" for anyone to kill it. Roe silenced all principled debate and nuance — and the conscience of America — for 50 years. But as one wag put it, ROE was a clump of words. Let us begin again.
Tuesday, July 19, 2022
I guess I touched a nerve.
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘A Deep Thought from a Presidential Historian (UPDATED),’ New Reform Club (July 19, 2022, 2:58 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/a-deep-thought-from-presidential.html>;
Tuesday, July 12, 2022
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘Trump’s Wife,’ New Reform Club (July 12, 2022, 11:26 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/trumps-wife.html>;
Monday, July 11, 2022
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘What the Self-Appointed Elites Think About You,’ New Reform Club (July 11, 2022, 1:49 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/what-self-appointed-elites-think-about.html>;
Friday, July 08, 2022
Wednesday, July 06, 2022
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘In My Inbox Today,’ New Reform Club (July 6, 2022, 1:27 PM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/in-my-inbox-today.html>;
Tuesday, July 05, 2022
Seth Barrett Tillman, Associate Professor
Maynooth University School of Law and Criminology
Scoil an Dlí agus na Coireolaíochta Ollscoil Mhá Nuad
(academic title & affiliation for identification purposes only)
The New York Times
Re: Peter Baker, ‘New Insights Into Trump’s State of Mind on Jan. 6 Chip Away at Doubts,’ New York Times (July 3, 2022), <https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/03/us/politics/new-insights-into-trumps-state-of-mind-on-jan-6-chip-away-at-doubts.html>.
In Baker’s article, he quoted attorney Josh Matz and proceeded to describe Matz as “as a lawyer for House Democrats during both of Mr. Trump’s impeachment trials in the Senate.” That was all true. But it leaves out something significant: Matz is currently one of the attorneys of record for E Jean Carroll, a plaintiff, who is suing Trump in a federal district court in New York. See Court Listener <https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18418220/carroll-v-trump/> (Dkt. No. 60). Given that Matz is on the opposite side from Trump in ongoing litigation, I suggest he is not well positioned to give a wholly unbiased judgment in relation to Trump. If Matz disclosed his current connection to Carroll v Trump to Baker, then I suggest Baker should have reported it. And if Matz—inadvertently—failed to disclose this to Baker, then perhaps the thing to do is for the New York Times to issue a suitable correction. See, e.g., Josh Matz, ‘Foreign Emoluments, Alexander Hamilton & A Twitter Kerfuffle,’ Take Care Blog (July 12, 2017), <https://takecareblog.com/blog/foreign-emoluments-alexander-hamilton-and-a-twitter-kerfuffle> (“To be sure, there’s always a fine balance to be struck between scholarly nuance and word limits, especially in op-eds and works of legal advocacy. Many capable lawyers and legal scholars fail, at times, to ....”).
Seth Barrett Tillman
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘Characterizing Sources At The New York Times,’ New Reform Club (July 5, 2022, 9:38 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/characterizing-sources-at-new-york-times.html>;
Monday, July 04, 2022
Friday, July 01, 2022
Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘The Decline of English,’ New Reform Club (July 1, 2022, 7:30 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-decline-of-english.html>;