Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire.—Gustav Mahler

Monday, July 27, 2026

BBC’s Passive Voice

 

‘A van drove into a crowd ....’ 

What we know about the Berlin Pride attack,’ BBC News,  <https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VRQRIYZ2tNU>;


----------------------------------------------

Seth Barrett Tillman, BBC’s Passive Voice,’ New Reform Club (July 27, 2026, 5:05 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2026/07/bbcs-passive-voice.html>; 

Friday, July 17, 2026

A Letter to The New Republic on Epistemic Closure

 

re: Jess Coleman, The Supreme Court’s Originalists Are Cracking Up, TNR (July 7, 2026), <https://newrepublic.com/article/212556/supreme-court-originalism-trump-barbara>. 

In Trump v. Slaughter (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority opinion announced: “[I]n Federalist No. 77, Hamilton said that the Senate’s consent ‘would be necessary to displace as well as to appoint,’ but it remains a subject of scholarly debate whether Hamilton meant ‘displace’ in the sense of ‘remove’ or ‘replace.’” Jess Coleman objects. Coleman affirms the correctness of the ‘displace’-means-‘remove’ position, and he announces that the contrary position is ‘bizarre.’ 

I have argued in academic journals since 2010, that is, long before Trump entered politics, that Hamilton’s ‘displace’-language means ‘replace’ and not ‘remove.’ Those who argue that ‘displace’ means ‘remove’ tend to clip only one sentence from Federalist No. 77, but if you read the entire paragraph in which that sentence appears, you will see that the discussion is better understood as involving replacing officers, as opposed to simply removing them. See <The Avalon Project : Federalist No 77>. 

Furthermore, in his celebrated Commentaries on the Constitution, Joseph Story affirmed that Hamilton’s ‘displace’-language was about replacing, as opposed to removing, officers. See <THE NEW REFORM CLUB: Strained (and Sloppy) Readings of the Constitution and Strained (and Sloppy) Readings of Hamilton’s Federalist No. 77 (Updated)>. More recently, it has come to light that, in his private correspondence to Senator Webster, Chancellor James Kent affirmed that Hamilton’s ‘displace’-language was speaking to replacing, as opposed to removing, officers. See <https://reason.com/volokh/2025/11/20/chancellor-james-kent-on-hamiltons-federalist-no-77-and-modern-academic-commentary/>. 

Whether Hamilton’s ‘displace’-language was speaking to replacing officers or to removing officers is a matter about which reasonable persons have and can disagree. Jess Coleman’s suggesting that one of these two views is ‘bizarre’ speaks to an unfortunate epistemic closure prevalent among far too many who would seek to guide and explain the world to others. By contrast, when the Slaughter Court cautiously recognized the long-standing historical dispute about the meaning of Federalist No. 77 and the Court’s majority actively chose not to inject itself into that debate, the Court acted in the sort of cautious manner that we should applaud, and not object. 

Sincerely, 

Seth Barrett Tillman, Associate Professor

Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘A Letter to The New Republic on Epistemic Closure,’ New Reform Club (July 17, 2026, 5:36 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2026/07/a-letter-to-new-republic-on-epistemic.html>.



Thursday, July 09, 2026

A Death in Ireland


A friend of mine, Terence, was buried today. My wife, my two youngest children, and I attended the funeral. We were all close to Terence, who is survived by his wife, two children, one grandchild, and several siblings, who also have children. Terence was a sincere friend, a highly educated man, who spoke several languages, including Irish and Biblical Hebrew. He was born circa 1943. Until he retired, he was the head of the examinations office at University College Dublin (“UCD”). His grandfather was the first Irish ambassador to Spain. At his funeral, I met the local aristocracy. I met a granddaughter of Eamon de Valera. Her mother died when she was four, and she was raised by her grandparents. I also met a granddaughter Sean T O’Kelly. This is sort of like meeting a grandchild of President Washington or President Van Buren. My children went to a primary school here in Ireland. That school’s retired principal, from around the time my children attended, was also at the funeral. He is a Manx speaker, and would be visiting the Isle of Man in consequence of the death of a friend there. Who knew?

Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘A Death in Ireland,’ New Reform Club (July 9, 2026, 5:26 PM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2026/07/a-death-in-ireland.html>;