In 2016, the Alliance for Justice posted, on its website, a letter from 350 academics to Senate Majority Leader McConnell explaining that it was the Senate’s “constitutional duty to give President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee a prompt and fair hearing and a timely vote.”
The Alliance for Justice’s letter was posted here: <https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Law-professor-SCOTUS-vacancy-letter.pdf>. But it is no longer there! Why is that? The press release was posted here: <https://www.afj.org/press-room/press-releases/over-350-lawprofessors-urge-senators-to-fulfill-their-constitutional-duty>. It too is no longer there! Why is that?
I discussed the letter here: Seth Barrett Tillman, The Two Discourses: How Non-Originalists Popularize Originalism and What that Means, New Reform Club (Mar. 28, 2016, 9:22 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-two-discourses-how-non-originalists.html>.
I have posted a copy of the original letter here: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3715342>. It is funny how things disappear from the web.
Seth
Seth Barrett Tillman, The Alliance for Justice’s 2016 Letter to McConnell has gone Missing!, New Reform Club (Oct. 20, 2020, 3:53 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2020/10/the-alliance-for-justices-2016-letter.html>.
PS: Here is another copy: <https://perma.cc/WY7Y-8JJ4>.
5 comments:
Everything was always known to be temporary, now we know is measured in days not decades.
Think government spending... “ Killing Deep States“
https://amzn.to/343A3YF
Another case of disappearing "ink"? The memory black hole opened up and ate it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160327133454/https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Law-professor-SCOTUS-vacancy-letter.pdf
All left-wing principles come with an expiration date.
Not only is the letter gone, but the banner at the top of the "Oops" page says, "With voting already underway, now is not the time to ram through a Supreme Court Justice. Alliance for Justice pledges to fight this nominee with everything we can." If that's not a perfect example of why ACB's nomination is only a problem because it's conservatives doing the nominating, I don't know what is.
Post a Comment