Blumenthal v.
Trump,
Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. filed 2017), is one of three
Emoluments-Clauses-related actions filed against President Trump. The initial Blumenthal complaint was filed on June
14, 2017 in the federal district court for the District of Columbia. The case
was assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. The
action was brought by scores of Democratic representatives and senators. It was
brought against the President in his official capacity, and so, the President
is represented exclusively by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”).
An
amended complaint, the now operative complaint, was filed on August 15, 2017. The
DOJ filed a motion to dismiss. It was fully briefed by the parties. There was
briefing by assorted amici (including yours truly*). And the court ordered
supplemental briefing from the parties responding to amici.
Oral
argument on the motion was heard on June 7, 2018.
The
court gave a preliminary ruling on the issue of standing, but left all other
threshold issues unresolved.** [In parallel litigation in the Southern District of New York (now on appeal in the Second Circuit), the judge held that the parties lacked standing. See CREW v. Trump, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-00458-GBD, 2017 WL 6524851, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210326, 276 F. Supp. 3d 174 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2017) (Daniels, J.), notice of appeal filed on Feb. 16, 2018.] In other words, in the District of Columbia action, Judge Sullivan’s standing-only ruling did not dispose
of the DOJ’s motion to dismiss. The customary or target deadline for resolving such
a motion is 6 months—i.e., the 6-month target to resolve the DOJ’s motion to dismiss was December 7, 2018. December 7 has come and gone. We are now 3 months
post-deadline. There has been no call by the court for further clarification, renewed
briefing, or renewed oral argument. Yet the DOJ’s motion to dismiss remains
unresolved.
Why?
Why
the delay?
Where
is the decision?
What
is going on?
The
last published report, as of March 2018, listing federal judges (and how many
of their motions are overdue—i.e., beyond the 6 month target) shows that Judge Sullivan had
no such outstanding motions.*** So why does this
motion remain undecided?
For what it is worth, there is parallel litigation against the President in the Fourth Circuit and Second Circuit. Oral argument in the Fourth Circuit case is scheduled for March 19, 2019, 9:30 AM, in Richmond. The oral argument in the Second Circuit case was on October 30, 2018. It follows that a Second Circuit decision is due circa April 30, 2019. I find it difficult to imagine that Judge Sullivan, in the District of Columbia action, is waiting for guidance from the Second and Fourth Circuits. Those decisions are not due for months. But if the delay is not for that reason, why is there any delay at all?
Seth
Welcome Instapundit readers!
* See Brief for Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman and the Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae in Support of the Defendant, Senator Richard Blumenthal v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2017) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 16-1 (redocketed at ECF No. 40), 2017 WL 4230605, 2017 U.S. Dist. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 30, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2996384>; see also Motion for Leave of Amici Curiae Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman and the Judicial Education Project to be Heard at Oral Argument, Senator Richard Blumenthal v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. May 21, 2018) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 52, 2018 WL 2321735, 2018 U.S. Dist. Ct. Motions LEXIS 46, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3177824>.
** See Blumenthal v. Trump, Civ. A. No. 17-cv-1154-EGS, 2018 WL 4681001, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167411, 335 F. Supp. 3d 45 (D.D.C. Sept. 28, 2018) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 59, <https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv1154-59>. In parallel litigation in the Southern District of New York (now on appeal in the Second Circuit), the judge held that the parties lacked standing. See CREW v. Trump, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-00458-GBD, 2017 WL 6524851, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210326, 276 F. Supp. 3d 174 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2017) (Daniels, J.), notice of appeal filed on Feb. 16, 2018, <http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=595>
For what it is worth, there is parallel litigation against the President in the Fourth Circuit and Second Circuit. Oral argument in the Fourth Circuit case is scheduled for March 19, 2019, 9:30 AM, in Richmond. The oral argument in the Second Circuit case was on October 30, 2018. It follows that a Second Circuit decision is due circa April 30, 2019. I find it difficult to imagine that Judge Sullivan, in the District of Columbia action, is waiting for guidance from the Second and Fourth Circuits. Those decisions are not due for months. But if the delay is not for that reason, why is there any delay at all?
Seth
Welcome Instapundit readers!
* See Brief for Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman and the Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae in Support of the Defendant, Senator Richard Blumenthal v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2017) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 16-1 (redocketed at ECF No. 40), 2017 WL 4230605, 2017 U.S. Dist. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 30, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2996384>; see also Motion for Leave of Amici Curiae Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman and the Judicial Education Project to be Heard at Oral Argument, Senator Richard Blumenthal v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. May 21, 2018) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 52, 2018 WL 2321735, 2018 U.S. Dist. Ct. Motions LEXIS 46, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3177824>.
** See Blumenthal v. Trump, Civ. A. No. 17-cv-1154-EGS, 2018 WL 4681001, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167411, 335 F. Supp. 3d 45 (D.D.C. Sept. 28, 2018) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 59, <https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv1154-59>. In parallel litigation in the Southern District of New York (now on appeal in the Second Circuit), the judge held that the parties lacked standing. See CREW v. Trump, Civ. A. No. 1:17-cv-00458-GBD, 2017 WL 6524851, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210326, 276 F. Supp. 3d 174 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2017) (Daniels, J.), notice of appeal filed on Feb. 16, 2018, <http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=595>
*** CJRA 8: U.S. District Courts—Motions Pending More Than Six Months March 2018, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra_8_0331.2018.pdf> (no motions pending more than 6 months); Sept. 2017 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra_8_0930.2017.pdf> (same); Mar. 2017 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra_8_0331.2017_0.pdf> (same); Sept. 2016 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/data_tables/cjra_8_0930.2016.pdf> (same); Mar. 2016 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra.8.0331.2016.pdf> (same); Sept. 2015 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra_table_8.pdf> (same); Mar. 2015 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra_table_8w_-_list_of_pending_motions_by_judge_03312015.pdf> (same); Sept. 2014 CJRA Report, <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/cjra-table8-sep2014.pdf> (same).
Seth Barrett Tillman, The Mystery of Blumenthal v. Trump, New Reform Club (Mar. 7, 2019, 2:16 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-mystery-of-blumenthal-v-trump.html>.
For Part II, see: Seth Barrett Tillman, Part II: The Mystery of Senator Richard Blumenthal v. President Donald J Trump, New Reform Club (Mar. 8, 2019, 1:38 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2019/03/part-ii-mystery-of-senator-richard.html>.
For Part II, see: Seth Barrett Tillman, Part II: The Mystery of Senator Richard Blumenthal v. President Donald J Trump, New Reform Club (Mar. 8, 2019, 1:38 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2019/03/part-ii-mystery-of-senator-richard.html>.
2 comments:
It will happen closer to the 2020 election cycle.
Almost losing all I had to trading really took severe effects on my mental health,
I had been scammed, I was able to talk to people about it and not be ashamed. It was when I did this I was able to come across Mrs maryshea03@Gmail. Com who helped me recover exactly a valuable sum from the amount I lost. I'm still in a bit of shock as I never knew this could happen. I am grateful and I want people who are in a similar situation to know that all hope is not lost and they can recover their money too.
Post a Comment