Peak Conlawprof:
“When the man was drunk, he was a danger to women.”
Peak Conlawprof:
“Kavanaugh clearly had a drinking problem, and it’s beginning to sound, more and more, like he could be an angry drunk.”I will refrain from commenting.
Seth
Seth Barrett Tillman, Peak Conlawprof (I) and (II), New Reform Club (Sept. 27, 2018, 9:37 AM), https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2018/09/peak-conlawprof-i-and-ii.html.
5 comments:
Your Professors? This site has to be owned by the Onion. Even Jake Tapper has said there is no corroborating evidence against Kavanaugh.
No evidence is now a prima facie case.
I'm not sure what the relevance of this is, or the relevance of the professor comments. Is there a logical fallacy, or poor judgment, or...? Taken out of context, I'm just not sure what the point here is. Perhaps you could explain.
Start in the sub-basement with "clearly". Work your way down this mighty oak of logical, evidence-based critical reasoning from there.
These conlaw professors did not even scratch the surface about the suspicious prefatory Fs the nominee used to spell "Fourth of July" in his yearbook.
Pull the thread, unravel the mystery. Follow the Fs. Rosebud.
Post a Comment