I have been informed that some people think this is a joke:
Allow me to remind you:
According to the American Psychological Association: "There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation." The only correct explanation for the first is patriarchy. The only correct explanation for the latter is enlightenment. Let us see who is laughing once Science catches up to the Right Side of History.
This woman had the correct enlightened idea: “Lesbian and bisexual women have much more voice and respect within the movement, so in the search for recognition of my struggle, with each day that passed, I deconstructed my heterosexuality and was substituting it with an artificial bisexuality.”
Alas, the patriarchy dragged her back with its sweaty man claws, hence the risible modifier "artificial" bisexuality. Before her backslide she was correct: there is no "heterosexual" trait that is not also a LGBT trait. It is a spectrum. There is room for everyone. There is no need for made up patriarchal fantasies like "heterosexuals."
Finally, recall that science cannot find a difference in the brains between heterosexuals and transsexuals. (The fact they are even looking proves the lasting hateful effects of the patriarchy.)
Hence there is only one reason to use a label like "heterosexuality": patriarchy.
This needs to go on the back of the tee.