See generally
Thus, between Washington and his nine cabinet
members, five of ten were either Framers or ratifiers or both. (Interestingly, four of these five Framer/ratifiers came from the three most populous states: Virginia (Washington & Randolph), Pennsylvania (Pickering), and New York (Hamilton). See 1790 census figures. Maybe small-state fear of big-state domination had an element of truth.)
Many
good historical sources list the President and Vice President as the two
highest paid officials of the early government, at $25,000 and $5,000 per year
respectively. But that is not correct. President Washington appointed Ministers Plenipotentiary for the United States at London (Pinckney) and at Paris (Morris)—each made $9,000 per year, and each was also granted
$9,000 for “outfit”!
See Alexander Hamilton, List of Civil Officers of the United States, Except Judges, with their Emoluments, for the Year Ending October 1, 1792 (Feb. 26, 1793), in 1 American State Papers: Miscellaneous 57, 57–68 (Walter Lowrie & Walter S. Franklin eds., Washington, Gales and Seaton 1834); see also Report on the Salaries, Fees, and Emoluments of Persons Holding Civil Office Under the United States (Feb. 26, 1793), in 14 The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, 157, 157–59 (Harold C. Syrett & Jacob E. Cooke eds., 1969). [The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has possession of the original document. I discuss this document in detail in Seth Barrett Tillman, Originalism & The Scope of the Constitution’s Disqualification Clause, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 59, 81–82 (2014).]
See Alexander Hamilton, List of Civil Officers of the United States, Except Judges, with their Emoluments, for the Year Ending October 1, 1792 (Feb. 26, 1793), in 1 American State Papers: Miscellaneous 57, 57–68 (Walter Lowrie & Walter S. Franklin eds., Washington, Gales and Seaton 1834); see also Report on the Salaries, Fees, and Emoluments of Persons Holding Civil Office Under the United States (Feb. 26, 1793), in 14 The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, 157, 157–59 (Harold C. Syrett & Jacob E. Cooke eds., 1969). [The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has possession of the original document. I discuss this document in detail in Seth Barrett Tillman, Originalism & The Scope of the Constitution’s Disqualification Clause, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 59, 81–82 (2014).]
Seth
PS: I am not counting
John Jay, who was Acting Secretary of State under the Constitution, as holdover Secretary
of Foreign Affairs from the outgoing Confederation government. Likewise, I am not counting Oliver Wolcott. Oliver Wolcott attended the Connecticut state
ratifying convention, and Oliver Wolcott was Hamilton’s successor at Treasury. However, the two Wolcotts were
father and son respectively. Finally, I am not counting Joseph Habersham. Joseph Habersham was a ratifier: he attended Georgia’s
state convention which ratified the Constitution. Habersham succeeded Pickering; thus Habersham became President Washington’s
third Postmaster General. See Noble E. Cunningham, The Process of Government
under Jefferson 18 (1978) (noting that “Habersham had been appointed
Postmaster General by Washington in 1795”). During Washington’s administration
and the early Federalist Era, Postmaster General was a senior post, but it was
not part of the President’s cabinet. Cf.
id. at 87 (indicating that as late as
Jefferson’s administration, the Postmaster General was not part of the
cabinet).
PPS: There is an online version of all 4 volumes of the first edition of Elliot’s Debates on the Hathi Trust website. [Available here] Sadly, I know of no freely accessible equivalent American website. The second edition, published in 1836, can be found here.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SethBTillman ( @SethBTillman )
Other Miscellaneous Americana posts:
Seth Barrett
Tillman, Miscellaneous Americana for the
New Year, The New Reform Club (Dec. 20, 2015, 4:02 PM).
Welcome Instapundit and Chicago
Boyz blog readers.
My
prior post: Seth Barrett
Tillman, Litigating (former) Senator HillaryClinton’s Legal Woes: A Response to Professor Rick Hasen (Election Law Blog)and Michael Stern (Point of Order blog), The New Reform Club (Feb. 2, 2016,
9:01 AM).
No comments:
Post a Comment