[Epicurus] does [praise virtue], and so
too Caius Gracchus, after [Gracchus] had granted extravagant doles and poured
out the funds of the [state] treasury like water, nonetheless, in his [own]
words, [he] posed as the protector of the treasury. Why am I [Cicero] to listen
to words, seeing that I have the deeds before my eyes?** The famous Piso, named
Frug[al], had spoken consistently against the Corn-law [Lex Frumentaria,
a/k/a Lex Sempronia, a/k/a Universal Basic Income]. When
the law was passed, in spite of his consular rank, [Piso] was there to receive
the corn. Gracchus noticed Piso standing in the throng; he asked him in the
hearing of the Roman people what consistency there was in coming for the corn
under the terms of the law which he had opposed. “I shouldn’t like it,
Gracchus, to come into your head to divide up my property among all the
citizens; but should you do so I should come for my share.” . . . . Read
Gracchus’ speeches and [based upon his speeches] you will say he was [the] protector of the treasury.
Marcus Tullius Cicero, Tusculan
Disputations, Book III, ch. XX (trans. J.E. King, 1971) (Cicero’s authorship circa 45 BCE) (Lex Frumentaria enacted circa 123 BCE).
**Quid verba audiam, cum facta videam?
Seth Barrett Tillman, Marcus
Tullius Cicero on Universal Basic Income, New Reform Club (Mar. 15,
2020, 3:47 PM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2020/03/marcus-tullius-cicero-on-universal.html>;
Alternate translation: But [Epicurus] commends virtue, and that
frequently; and indeed Caius Gracchus, when he had made the largest
distributions of the public money [to the people], and had exhausted the
treasury, nevertheless [he] spoke much of defending the [public] treasury. What
signifies what men say when we see what they do? That Piso, who was
surnamed Frugal, had always harangued against the law that was proposed for
distributing the corn; but when it had passed, though a man of consular
dignity, he came to receive the corn [like everyone else]. Gracchus observed
Piso standing in the court, and asked him, in the hearing of the people, how it
was consistent for him to take corn by a law he had himself opposed. “It was,”
said he, “against your distributing my goods to every man as you thought
proper; but, as you do so, I claim my share.” Did not this grave and wise man
sufficiently show that the public revenue was dissipated by the Sempronian law?
Read Gracchus’s speeches, and you will pronounce him the advocate of the [public]
treasury.