Seth, why do you care so much about this issue [the Emoluments Clauses cases] and spend so much of your time on it?
And there is always the outside chance that some current or future judge, judge's law clerk, or practitioner might be reading my tweets. I post at CONLAWPROF--and at least 1 Article III judge participates. And a different Article III judge once responded to one of my blog posts [at New Reform Club].
... [FYI] Tillman amicus briefs in matters not yet resolved:
Brief of Scholar S.B.Tillman & the Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae Supporting Appellee and Affirmance, CREW v Trump, No. 18-0474-cv (2d Cir June 5, 2018), ECF No. 135, 2018 WL 2722468, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3183012 …;
Brief for Scholar S.B.Tillman & the Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae in Support of the Defendant, Blumenthal v. Trump, Civ A No 1:17-cv-01154-EGS (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2017) (Sullivan, J.), ECF No. 16-1 (redocketed ECF No. 40), 2017 WL 4230605, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2996384 …;
Brief for Scholar S.B.Tillman & the Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party with Respect to Motion to Dismiss, DC & MD v Trump, individual capacity, Civ A No 8:17-cv-01596-PJM (D Md May 8, 2018) (Messitte, J), ECF No 114, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3174268 …;
Seth Barrett Tillman, Why I Post On The Emoluments Clauses Cases, New Reform Club (Nov. 30, 2018, 1:30 AM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2018/11/why-i-post-on-emoluments-clauses-cases_30.html>.
No comments:
Post a Comment