24 August 2016
The Guardian
Letters
Editor
guardian.letters@theguardian.com
RE: Sisonke Msimang’s Caster Semenya is the one at a disadvantage, 24 August 2016, 08.00
BST, http://tinyurl.com/hf5mh6p
Dear
Letters Editor & Sisonke Msimang,
In Caster Semenya
is the one at a disadvantage, Sisonke
Msimang wrote: “The idea that testosterone levels could constitute an unfair
advantage in this climate is laughable.” Msimang is entirely wrong. Nearly
every Olympic sport divides competitors by sex, i.e., holding separate men’s
and women’s competitions.
Why? The
justification for that rigid separation of the sexes is not rooted in
historical precedents handed down from the Olympics of the ancient Greeks. Nor
is it rooted in some religious tradition’s mandating a particularistic and
antiquated contestable conception of morality in public places. Rather, the
justification for separate men’s and women’s sports competitions comes from the
widespread recognition that men and women have highly significant biological
differences, including systematically different levels of testosterone. If
different testosterone levels did not obviously
confer a great advantage on men, then
there would be no good reason to hold separate women-only Olympic events. Indeed, if different testosterone levels did not confer great advantage
on men, then modernity, secularity, and simple fairness would compel our ending sex-segregated
sports events.
Bottom line:
testosterone counts.
Sincerely,
Seth Barrett Tillman
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SethBTillman ( @SethBTillman )
Seth Barrett Tillman, Submitted as a Letter to the Editor at The Guardian, Response to Sisonke Msimang’s "Caster Semenya is the one at a disadvantage," New Reform Club (Aug. 26, 2016, 1:00 PM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2016/08/letter-to-editor-guardian-response-to.html>, <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2829314>;
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SethBTillman ( @SethBTillman )
Seth Barrett Tillman, Submitted as a Letter to the Editor at The Guardian, Response to Sisonke Msimang’s "Caster Semenya is the one at a disadvantage," New Reform Club (Aug. 26, 2016, 1:00 PM), <https://reformclub.blogspot.com/2016/08/letter-to-editor-guardian-response-to.html>, <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2829314>;
My prior post: Seth
Barrett Tillman, The Stuarts:
Voluntary Compliance with Government Fiat, The New
Reform Club (Aug. 23, 2016, 7:25 AM)
No comments:
Post a Comment