tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post6619726180278684792..comments2024-03-06T03:15:58.539-05:00Comments on <b>THE NEW REFORM CLUB</b>: A Response to Checks & Balances' Press Release on the Mueller ReportHunter Bakerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14961831404331998743noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-60928157951947745212019-12-26T08:37:55.143-05:002019-12-26T08:37:55.143-05:00Don't make the same mistake I did. In hindsigh...Don't make the same mistake I did. In hindsight I wish I had checked the reviews before investing. Once your money goes in, it's not coming out. That simple. I called and messaged<br /><br /> their finance department over 20 times, trying to withdraw but not once did it go through. Not easy finding reliable help too with so many wolves posing as recovery agents out there. I did manage to however, even if it was quite unorthodox. In any case, if you have any questions about my experience with BB you can reach me on +15623847738 we can do this togetherRobbie Paytonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08228686839303829668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-88591113357623469832019-05-05T17:19:59.582-04:002019-05-05T17:19:59.582-04:00AG Barr chose to accept the Report without going i...AG Barr chose to accept the Report without going into the evidence, stating that it's finished, but the Congress, citing their oversight responsibilities, thinks otherwise. I am confused about the power of Congress to engage in oversight, and would appreciate a clarification. It doesn't exist in the Constitution, unless the power to constitute tribunals means oversight. Wouldn't it be limited to legislative matters? What about separation of powers? Should the power of oversight exist, as it seems to have for some time now, the Congress has no right to violate the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable seizures and searches, requiring them to them limit their inquiries to specific points where they have a basis for concern. <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-47491380415973612872019-04-25T21:37:40.632-04:002019-04-25T21:37:40.632-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-88484717096682059922019-04-24T13:07:55.162-04:002019-04-24T13:07:55.162-04:00The media mentions on the published page with thei...The media mentions on the published page with their press release, to discussions with The Bulwark and MSNBC, reveal as much about their bias as the text.<br /><br />It bears repeating, continuously and loudly, that presidential privilege was not invoked and that the Mueller investigation had unprecedented access to both executive branch personnel and documents that would clearly reveal any claim of obstruction as nothing other than political posturing.KSpapinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-56733848415033500002019-04-24T12:58:12.353-04:002019-04-24T12:58:12.353-04:00Folks have lost their minds over Trump and it is s...Folks have lost their minds over Trump and it is simply astonishing to see formerly balanced professionals become raging lunatics.<br /><br />It's scary to consider that folks may not regain their minds anytime soon.MikePhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13949843295940426242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-78733673277086917372019-04-24T09:44:16.957-04:002019-04-24T09:44:16.957-04:00In 2014, the DOJ finally struck down the previous ...In 2014, the DOJ finally struck down the previous rule against recording interviews, finally recognizing the obvious, that actually hearing the words as uttered could have a positive contribution to finding the truth that was not being served by only recording the impressions of agents in form 302s. <br /><br />The Mueller report is wall-to-wall footnotes supporting their allegations referring back to form 302s. <br /><br />Are there tapes? Are the 302s accurate? Is there bias? Mueller's conduct to prefer 302s over recordings is a choice and a poor one both for the interests of justice and for the interests of political settlement of the issues arising from the election of 2016. <br /><br />This stinks on ice. TMLutashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12033938954514865135noreply@blogger.com