tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post3190601292382477294..comments2024-03-06T03:15:58.539-05:00Comments on <b>THE NEW REFORM CLUB</b>: Why The Debate on "Office" and "Officers" MattersHunter Bakerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14961831404331998743noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-91598816891225480072016-01-11T07:07:48.678-05:002016-01-11T07:07:48.678-05:00An event planner is usually aware of the clients&#...An event planner is usually aware of the clients' requirements. Experienced planners will suggest you the most suitable venue for your corporate events. Proper <a href="https://eventup.com/" rel="nofollow">corporate event planning</a> will guarantee the meal is of top quality, and make sure adequate amount of food is available for the guests.Jaisy Boniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03386808130905875144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-38323930331371704312015-12-29T17:38:19.463-05:002015-12-29T17:38:19.463-05:00Better to answer the second question first. A stat...Better to answer the second question first. A statute surely lacks the power to increase or diminish the qualification for President defined in the Constitution. And if that is so, we should not presume the language means to accomplish an absurdity. Instead, it more naturally comports with the concept of "office" as used in the Appointments Clause, to the effect that the Senate may not "consent" to the appointment of officers held in violation of section 2071. <br /><br />But that raises still another quandary concerning the propriety of such "entrenching rules," i.e., rules that violate the principle that "one legislature may not bind the legislative authority of its successors." In which case, the latter clause of section 2071 could impose no effect apart from a black eye, in a nation who loves its political pugilists. Tim Kowalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02196125161888520769noreply@blogger.com