tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post113872607759619872..comments2024-03-06T03:15:58.539-05:00Comments on <b>THE NEW REFORM CLUB</b>: Score One for Baker's Political Prognostication PowersHunter Bakerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14961831404331998743noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-1139375765034415002006-02-08T00:16:00.000-05:002006-02-08T00:16:00.000-05:00Hmmm. 42 votes against. A serious filibuster wou...Hmmm. 42 votes against. A serious filibuster would have beaten him.<BR/><BR/>It seems to me that gloating is reserved for those who can't, or don't, count.Ed Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10056539160596825210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-1138747961696361652006-01-31T17:52:00.000-05:002006-01-31T17:52:00.000-05:00Actually, T, you accused me of revisionism, which ...Actually, T, you accused me of revisionism, which would indicate a mistake of history (although revisionism as actually means to correct history). Since I was very clearly speaking historically of the Supreme Court then it would not be "nuanced" to not be speaking of other judicial nominations. It would simply be to speak of what I was specifically speaking about.<BR/><BR/>Improve your aim or get off the court.Hunter Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14961831404331998743noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8776899.post-1138729288057872872006-01-31T12:41:00.000-05:002006-01-31T12:41:00.000-05:00I think Kennedy is basically Harry Blackmun all ov...I think Kennedy is basically Harry Blackmun all over again. <BR/><BR/>On the other question T raises, I think he has confused the lower courts with the Supreme Court, to which I was clearly and obviously referring. Thus, the lack of "revisionism."Hunter Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14961831404331998743noreply@blogger.com